Which optics does the nokia 808 use

In this article, landscape photographer Erez Marom explains how he thinks about the concept of originality in landscape photography, and how the creation of unique images is still possible, even in over-shot locations. Watch his review to find out why. Recently the winners and runners up were announced for the Natural Landscape Photography Awards. The new version of the digital asset management tool promises improved performance and includes a new UI, new editing tools and improved workflow options.

Nikon doesn't specifically mention any future products, but does state the collaboration with Nissin and Profoto will 'increase reliable options for Nikon camera users, expanding possibilities for imaging expression'. Despite being a copy of a model from a far more popular manufacturer at its time of release, the Lomo LC-A has become an iconic camera in film photography culture and was the catalyst for the experimental 'Lomography' movement.

Zenfolio has announced the acquisition of Format, a popular website-building platform for photographers and other artists. The acquisition further bolsters Zenfolio's ongoing efforts to reinvigorate its business model and position itself a strong option for photographers looking to build a website and run a business.

The 'Deakinizer' lens was made and popularized by cinematographer Roger Deakins when he used a modified Arri Macro lens to capture dreamy, tilt-shift like shots for the movie Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford. NASA has published the first images from Landsat 9, a new space-based satellite designed to observe Earth in incredible detail.

Geological Survey. But how much difference does the longer 40mm equivalent lens of the 'X' version make to the shooting experience? Click through to read more. Want to learn more about the Nikon Z9? Do you have a burning question you haven't seen answered anywhere else? Join us for a live Twitter Space on Thursday, November 11, and be part of the conversation.

Click through for details. The four firmware updates bring improved autofocus performance in a number of different shooting modes, as well as support for Nikon's new FTZ II mount adapter and Nikkor Z mm F4 S lens.

Adrian Smith is back with another excellent slow-motion video of insects filmed with a high-speed Phantom camera. The original Tamron mm F2. Now Tamron is back with a second gen version that promises to be even better. Does it deliver on that claim? Chris and Jordan did a side-by-side comparison to find out.

Check out their gallery of sample photos to judge critical image quality for yourself. The lens will be a part of Panasonic's F1. Aptolux is a new company formed by videographers to create lighting solutions for videographers. Its first product is the Aptolux MP-1, a modular, transforming LED light that can be as compact as a lunchbox when not being used yet deliver bright, efficient light.

Sony's latest a7-series model is the most capable yet, but also the most expensive. We've been using Panasonic's new Lumix S 35mm F1. Panasonic has announced the Lumix S 35mm F1. Panasonic has released firmware version 1.

The Hubble Space Telescope is in safe mode as engineers work to investigate what's wrong with the telescope's onboard instruments. This is the second time the venerable telescope has faced extended downtime after being offline for a month earlier this year.

Panasonic China has posted a pair of images to various Chinese social media sites that tease what appears to be a new lens launch. Gordon Laing is back at it again with another Retro Review. In this episode, Laing goes back 25 years to provide an in-depth overview of Nikon's unique Coolpix camera, which was half compact camera, half PDA. The adapter includes optics to help offset the crop factor of APS-C cameras. OM Digital Solutions — the company that's bought the Olympus imaging division — has just launched the M.

Zuiko Digital ED 20mm F1. Click through for a closer look. Chris and Jordan tease-out the differences. Submit a News Tip! Reading mode: Light Dark. Login Register. Best cameras and lenses. Now reading: Nokia PureView Review 27 comments. A Four Thirds sensor is included for scale. As you can see, the PureView is packing quite an impressive sensor, much larger than those found in compact cameras, and not that much smaller than the CX-format sensors used by Nikon 1 and Sony RX Images captured in the 's PureView modes are created by oversampling from the sensor's full resolution.

At the 's 'native' focal length of 28mm equivalent, the oversampling ratio is for 3MP images, compared to for 5MP and for 8MP. Tags: review , mobile , nokia , pureview. Next page. Nokia Pureview. We are retrieving offers for your location, please refresh the page to see the prices. View Comments Comments All Timmbits omg! Timmbits DPR: in your image comparing sensor sizes, you write "four thirds" instead of mft or "micro four thirds".

Pedrocas Here is the issue I have with this. Max Thunder h2k - There is a powerful led light too, used for video. The system works very well overall. DxO's report is impressive.. GuySonic This new 'camera' is kinda cool having full HD video features. EasycapExpertti What! Lan Did you also take the test chart at full resolution? For the price, I'd have liked the lens cover case thrown in too EasycapExpertti Excellent review - thank You.

S a m i Was there some particular reason to use different shutter speeds? She's a tough little thing too : Could do with auto-HDR mentioned in review , panorama other than the one in the Camera Lover Pack app which isn't very good and still image stabilisation also mentioned in review.

Thanks Nokia, Symbian and DD's team! You may also like. A closer look at Pureview: Nokia's and compared in our studio test scene. Microsoft Surface Pro 4 comes with larger screen and more power. More about gear in this article.

Latest sample galleries. A small amount of pinch zoom also captures better-than-expected detail in good light. It renders a slight but pleasant background bokeh effect with portraits, too. The Nokia provides good exposures in some indoor and low-light conditions, but noticeably underexposes in very low light. The use of flash improves detail in extreme low light, but flash portraits remain noticeably underexposed compared to newer devices. Flash pictures also display some white balance inconsistencies, including variation in color between the center and edges, as well as heavy vignetting.

Low-light detail deteriorates quickly when using the digital zoom. As you can see the Nokia displays a strong loss of detail compared to recent devices, which offer shorter exposure time and less camera shake.

The new temporal analysis of video under the updated protocol helps us detect more issues with color and exposure in video. However, we detected some color issues, with strong color casts in all light conditions, and heavy color shading.

Video autofocus is slow, too, making smooth videos with subject tracking challenging. The Nokia PureView achieves a total photo score of In this section, we take a closer look at the image-quality sub-scores that are combined to make up the final DxOMark Mobile Photo score. The new DxOMark Mobile testing protocol for Exposure and Contrast is more challenging than before, with new high-contrast outdoor and indoor scenes, as well as HDR measurements in the lab. We are also able to test in extreme low light down to 1 lux, so as to measure which smartphones produce the best exposures in very dark environments.

In well-balanced bright or outdoor lighting conditions, the Nokia is capable of good exposures, with good contrast and color. However, in extreme low light, images are totally underexposed. The new DxOMark Mobile testing protocol includes analysis of exposure in extremely low light 1 Lux , where the Nokia fails to record almost any detail, resulting in an unusable image. Although some detail was recorded in the bright background when shooting backlit portraits, the faces are totally underexposed, with no discernable details.

Shooting a backlit portrait against a window the Nokia accurately recorded elements of the brighter parts of the scene behind the subject, but the portrait itself was completely under exposed. The new testing protocol for color includes using a wider range of lighting conditions and color temperatures for better evaluating color accuracy. The Nokia offers good saturation in outdoor conditions. A slight blue color cast is visible, but well within acceptable limits.

However, it records strong yellow color casts in low-light conditions and green color casts are visible under fluorescent light. Some variation in white balance in consecutive shots under all conditions is also apparent, so color accuracy can vary between shots.

Strong color shading is visible in all lighting conditions, too, with a noticeable difference in neutral hues between the center and the edges of the frame. Underexposure in extreme low light adds up to strong desaturation.

In addition to focus accuracy, the new testing protocol now measures the time required for the device to find focus in a range of different lighting conditions.

In bright light, the Nokia offers fairly consistent autofocus performance, capturing a high number of in-focus images. Having to operate a large lens, autofocus speed is pretty slow, even in bright light.

The average delay is in excess of ms 1 second between tapping to take a picture and the device finding focus. In lower light conditions, this delay is often even longer, and more inconsistent, too, with focusing times well over ms, and sometimes as long as ms, thus exacerbating the problem. Evaluating the time it takes to focus helps us identify if you can get the right shot at the right time. I appreciate - enormously - how it helps me catch every moments i want to shoot on.

Only symbian OS can handle that wooping camera for now. Maybe in the near future apple samsung and other mobile manufacturers would be able to deliver the same type of camera but i'd say that would really take too much time.

Nokia had done the best so far. Things could be about to get interesting That's the conclusion of dpreview's review of Hasn't anyone noticed how the digital camera market has changed last months, with practically all manufacturers presenting small, everyday cameras sporting huge compared to the recent past sensors? Am I suggesting that a phone manufacturer somehow managed to haste the camera manufacturers into presenting great products, we would otherwise have to wait for some more years to see?

Because that would clearly be a Nokia victory And while the traditional Asian camera manufacturers speed up to integrate their newly achieved know how and idea's into devices that can call, upload and surf, the is hardly known no markting effort, not to hurt MS and Pureview redifined to the public as a kind of IOS for night shots that was supposed to give you sharp images at night at all circumstances. A typical Nokia job finished. Over to the next tech demo.

It does not have the ui mastery of iphone, sure the old Symbian is showing it's age For me worth every penny, as I will always have a good camera with me wherever I go.

Killer camera? It sucks compared to a real camera. Don't delude yourself into thinking it is anything more than a phone with a camera built in. I am totally unimpressed with the sample images. They are only a little over 2mp. I thought it produced 38mp images or was that false advertising? I think you are the only one deluding yourself. The sample photos give the lie to your absurd 2mp claim, and I'll take the word of a professional reviewer over yours any day.

The incapability of the "executive" sellers is enough to blow up nokia as it'll take much effort Hehehe, the comments : Foremost it takes an idiot to conclude Nokia needs any help in destroying sales of its next flagship phone. They Nokia have proven to be capable to handle this task perfectly on their own: -announce the OS dead in early even though supported till and forming your main sales -non availability of the flagship device in key markets through regular sales channels -no marketing effort apart from a few tech interviews -Windows phone is plan A and plan B mantra So I'd suspect expect the idiot himself is actually paid by Nokia, their shareholder, or maybe it is their CEO with too much time on his hands :.

I am so sick of the moronic comments here and one idiot in particular. Why doesn't DPR staff take out the trash? If you were a Professional Photographer you would appreciate what a wonderful piece of tech this Nokia is.

Instead of wasting your time here bad mouthing it. Obviously you are not. Mind you the Canon does not have digital stereo mic recording in HD video up to db. You can keep the useless apps, ill keep my Pureview camera. Amazon USA has 25 reviews on the Nokia right now, real buyers that's the only reason they can review it.

Have a read before buying, they are very insightful. For example, this is not "almost euros". Everywhere below Finland between and ; amazon. Noone bans you from ordering directly from amazon. Actually, a lot of us Europeans have purchased our from European Amazon. As a Professional Photographer for the last 8 years I can admit that I've had my Nokia Pureview a month now also an Apple user for almost 10 years that the Pureview is the best piece of tech not only of but for the last 5 years.

It's a shame that Apple's Marketing has most people brainwashed into needing worthless App's. LasvegasPhotographer that is a load of crap. The Pureview has a tiny sensor and can not come close to the quality of a full frame sensor purely because technilogical limitations. I'm not saying that it isn't a great achievement but if you say it is better than a 5DmkII with L lens you need new glasses or a better monitor. What do you mean with up to dB recording. I doubt it is dB dynamic range which is only achieved with top end studio equipment.

Most consumer audio equipment is only 80 to dB. Just let you know the difference when its VERY loud. You can skip to The video has a short clip from a Galaxy Nexus for comparison.

Nokia - The best camera phone ever! Great site, thank you for reminding about the sound recording possibility. Finally revenge in Dolby Glory for refusing entrance to my D a couple of years back.

I find the Pureview very capable to capture atmosphere correctly. Great job on such a tiny camera. Too bad it runs Symbian. And they're going to come out with a windows version? Nokia's engineering dept is still there, a lot of dedicated and sharp ppl.

It's the marketing and business ppl that really did them in. I was always happy with the three Nokia phones I have owned over the years, but their OS is what kept me from buying another one. The hardware was always good. Actually Windows Phone 8 is looking very good.

I think you may be confusing Windows Phone with the older Windows Mobile. These are two completely different systems. The Windows Phone 8 version won't have the 's big sensor it'd make the WP 8 phone too expensive since the WP 8 phone's guts are much more expensive than the computer guts of the The high end Nokia WP 8 is the and has a standard size sensor but they add Image Stabilization which is cool.

Came across this fascinating article about the development journey this camera took at Nokia and thought others might like to read it too:.

I'm very impressed not just with the technology, but also with the outside-the-box thinking that fueled its development. Very impressive. One thing I also like about this camera phone is that it also reportedly has very superior audio playback. Nice job by Nokia! I notice that many of points in the "cons" list must be possible to fix by a software update. In-camera HDR would be the most important fix if I could choose.

Oh i forgot Nokia has a lot of "useless" megapixels to be compared with a real photo cameras. Watching this full size grass shot make I've made with my Pureview , are these 38MP in fact useless by your expert estimation? I have only a lowly D and a few primes to compare. Need a real 20 - 40MP cam for scientific comparison. It makes sense to do a comparison with - other high-end camera-phones. Btw, holds up very well against 5D2 for video.

I couldn't read it on the other photo samples but nokia I noticed that too, but if you look the full-sized photos, you'll see that they have been taken from totally different angles.

That explains a lot. Very impressed by the image quality. Pretty soon I'll be able to get rid of my small digital camera and cell phone. Handbag is getting very heavy. My next purchase will be a Nokia PureView , or something like it.

I can't wait. Fine job, Nokia! I REALLY recommend checking out the direct comparison of the two phones in the two shots right under the sentence "Highlight roll off, although not as nice as a DSLR of course is better than most small chip pocket cameras and certainly an improvement over the iPhone 4S.

Of course, by dialing-in a The article states the shadows aren't very noisy. Nokia, do you plan to fix this? I can assure that isn't true. A good third of my article is about how Symbian is a pale imitation of Apple's iOS and that the video resolution isn't up to the iPhone's standard with Filmic Pro.

Nokia deserve praise where it is due, the facts are pretty obvious in this case. You sir need to quit the conspiracies, the facts are staring you in the face.

Thanks for putting a link to that review up - its a good one. You can finally see a direct comparison with iPhone 4S camera pics which the blows away as it should. If you need a basic phone with the best camera, seems like this is it at this point, folks needing lots of apps and stuff won't be happy with it though.

Didnt care to read the review of a phone with camera. Then I wanted to investigate what all this comotion is about. After reading the review and checking with the compasison tool, I have to say I am blown away. This technology seems like a godsend for people like me who wants a bring-along-always camera. Since it is a smartphone, the size penalty is nil, as you would have the phone with you anyway.

So in principle it doesnt get any smaller than this. Well, I have a Symbian phone and while I have no love for it, it is reasonably functional. When a WP8 phone with the same pureview camera is released, I will be ready to snap up an at a heavy discount! I have got me a as soon as it was available. I certainly wouldn't have purchased a Windows, Android or iphone.

I had an Android phone and hated it. A wiretap in my pocket makes me feel uneasy. I suspect, that most of the expert opinion about symbian heralded here, is just what these guys have read elsewhere. Yes I think Symbian has more settings to dive in, but that's what I like.

Reminds me of that old joke, that says Russian products are made for shrewd users, american products are made for the gormless user. Too bad because the N call it the predecessor of the N9 was the only "phone" I have used that allowed me to run "the Gimp" to edit the pictures on device. If Nokia had continued this way with Maemo OS we would be close to full editing and post processing on a pocketable device :. Most users don't need to use desktop editing software on their phone.

A WP8 device will more than cater to the needs of most users who want to be able to take fantastic shots without carrying a second device. And WP8 is a very different beast to wp7, there are some massive changes under the hood. As for editing, there will be a variety of basic editing apps on the marketplace, but really, a phone is not the ideal form factor for full blown editing. Also it is very unlikely that we will see one of these in an iphone due to a the bulge on the back - apple cares about style too much to do that and b this took nokia 5 years to develop, it's a lot more complex than it appears when explained in this article.

Who the hell wrote that review? Quote: "What it can't do, of course, is provide one of the other benefits of zoom in a conventional optical system - background blur.

Even on a cheap small-sensor compact, you can achieve a degree of subject and background separation by zooming in, and reducing depth of field. Fundamental misunderstanding of optical principles here! Take a portrait with a given distance to a person with a mm lens.

Take the same portrait from the same distance with a 17 mm lens. Then "digitally zoom into" the 17mm pic on your monitor so that the size of the face matches on both pics side by side. With the same circle of confusion, and at the same subject-to-camera distance, a longer lens gives less depth of field than a shorter one.

You can see this for yourself by playing around with the FL value in a dof calculator like this one:. If you crop from a 28mm shot on the , you may see an increase in background blurriness compared to the uncropped original at the same size and viewing distance but that's just because you're making the blurry bits bigger.

On the other hand, with the subject the same size in the frame ie a constant magnification depth of field is the same at different FLs. But subject-camera distance must increase with FL. You say it for yourself: "If you crop from a 28mm shot on the , you may see an increase in background blurriness compared to the uncropped original at the same size and viewing distance but that's just because you're making the blurry bits bigger.

And by zooming in optically the blur disc diameter increases by the same amount as it does by cropping and enlarging via digital zoom. Look, I just took 2 pictures on the Canon S, at wide and tele, of a subject about a meter away, with the background effectively at infinity.

Max available aperture at both lens settings. The shot taken at mm has a blurrier background. It just does. I'm looking at it right now. So your assertion that:. I'm a bit surprised, as a posting newcomer to dpreview - easily the best photo review site out there - to see such a fundamental discussion point cause an argument.

Most actual lenses seem to be somewhere in between as all the elements joggle about during the zoom, hence the behaviour is a bit hard to predict. The idea of a super high res sensor plus a wide, bright, fixed focus lens and great digital downsampling, is a good one.

It looks like the studio scene from the is lacking in contrast, saturation, and sharpness. It is also a bit off white. All of these could easily be enhanced in Photoshop without loss of detail.

I know that a sample image is a sample image but it would also be nice to see the studio shot with Photoshop auto contrast, auto exposure, corrected WB, and improved saturation to see how that compares to other cameras.

If you can see past the faded sample it looks like it has great potential. It has more detail than most cameras which is something that is most difficult to add later. Feel free to download the shot, and have your wicked way with it - all of our studio comparison images are available for download. Barney Britton: I must apologize - you are absolutely right!

I just was about to take some shots to see what really is the case when I realized the point of my misconception: An aperture of say 4. Thus background blur MUST be different. I thought I was about to discover a common misconception concerning DOF whereas the mistake was on my side!

Have a nice day and keep up the good work! It all depends on how much is protected by patents that Nokia owns. I think Samsung may be cautious after their problems with Apple.

Perhaps, but such hasn't stopped Apple, for example, with its expensive 'problems' with Creative, CSIRO etc in the past and I suspect the crash through or crash approach to borrowing other people's technology will persist for the big players. Belle is a lot more bearable on an than for example on a N8.

It's actually pretty nice with the UI transitions and all Christmas would be nice, but I seriously doubt it. Fingers crossed I sure hope if you're right in 3 months time we get some sort of PV tech inside the WP8 phones.

Surely it takes time to re-compile the code to work on WP7. My bet is it will take them over a year to implement Pureview on WP8. The reason the has been released is because the WP version is still so far away that others might steal the scope from Nokia if they had kept it a lab concept like other cool stuff at Nokia that never saw daylight because of indecisive management. Phone OS aside this "camera" is only let down by relatively poor DR to be expected with small photosites and the lack of an inbuilt HDR function.

I have used a Galaxy SII in an "emergency" when my normal compact camera was not with me and with strong backligting of the subject the results were horrible. I would expect the Nokia to be no better on this count. Otherwise, Nokia needs to be commended as this is a true landmark developement and looking at the sample images they have even got their noise reduction down to a fine art - better than most compacts I would say.

All Sony needs to do is put phone capability into the RX and voila a truly knockout Camera phone rather than this Phone camera. God knows why Nokia spent so long developing this only to hamper it with an outdated operating system. They started developing this a long time ago, when Symbian was their only option. I have a history of 40 years of amateur photography starting with Minolta SRT Now I have one months experience using Nokia as a camera but also as a smartphone.

I have taken over pictures so far, travel, close ups, landscape, low light, thunderstorm etc, also videos, and I am very much impressed. Using the camera, I made a Google search of sculptures close to my home, located them to the map application, started the sports tracker application and started cycling. One by one I found them, took the images, and afterwards it was easy to see the pictures on the map, to make sure, that I had not missed any.

In addition to that I got data of the cycling exercise, the location of the images is also stored on sports tracker data. To muffle wind sound artifacts especially during video recording, I made a muffler of fur, it works quite nicely. The camera works nicely and the camera is a good enough smartphone for my use. What will kill this potentially good phone is the phone itself. It does not run Android nor Windows 8. It has a lousy screen resolution. How could the best camera phone have a screen resolution of x ??????

Cant see myself buying it, although this is the type of camera a photog like me would want in a phone. Until Nokia gets its OS business sorted out, no way. This has a decent camera, but now it looks like the phone stayed home. Yes the screen resolution is sadly a limitation of Symbian. But don't forget high res big screens impact battery life.