What was jacksonian democracy yahoo

People don't ask that question, but why was there the Civil War? Why could that one not have been worked out? On Monday night, Trump clarified his remarks via his Twitter account. Would never have let it happen! Among historians and other academics, the Jackson presidency has been studied in detail for a long time. In , the state of South Carolina, enraged by tariffs placed on trade by the federal government, convened a convention and decided to ignore the congressional acts about the tariffs.

In December , President Jackson issued a proclamation that stated the nullification movement was wrong on constitutional grounds. In March , Congress authorized President Jackson to use military force, if needed, to enforce the tariff laws in South Carolina.

At the time, Jackson told Lewis Cass that he saw the crisis, in no uncertain terms, as a secession crisis. Henry Clay and others brokered a compromise in Congress that averted a physical showdown between federal troops and the state of South Carolina. After the deal was struck, Jackson wrote to the Rev. But two years later, President Jackson interceded on the side of the slave-holding states in another controversy about the abolitionist movement.

Jackson had also owned slaves for much of his adult life. Northern opponents of slavery had started one of the first-ever direct-mail campaigns in by sending abolitionist literature through the federal mail system to clergy and public officials. Jackson and his postmaster general allowed local southern officials to intercept and destroy the literature.

In his farewell address, Jackson addressed both of these situations. The outgoing President spoke about sectionalism in blunt terms. But he also repeated the need to keep the Union solvent at the same time, under one constitutional system of laws.

However, Jackson also reinforced the concept of state sovereignty and the ability of people within states to control their own destiny. The Jacksonian Presidency has been called the triumph of the common man. Scholars, however, still debate his effectiveness in helping the people who put him in office. Engle is a professor of history and director of the history symposium series at Florida Atlantic University. Skip to main content.

Enter some words or an event code to find. This program is over. Hope you didn't miss it! Saturday, April 22, - a. President Trump seemingly hopes to disempower and penalize immigrants, Muslims, Hispanics, and other minority groups.

Evangelical Protestants, particularly from New England, tried to protect minority groups during the age of majoritarianism. In fact, his opposition to abolitionist groups and insistence on relocating Native Americans for westward expansion likely hastened its inevitability. Evangelical Protestants set precedent for grassroots activism through their bottom-up legal cases and congressional petition drives. Disenfranchised people, particularly women, were central to these efforts.

White populist men either owned or aspired to own slaves. Populists used alcohol to cope with their daily realities. Evangelicals resisted this because they came to know Natives through decades of missionary efforts. President Trump diverges from his hero Jackson regarding evangelicals simply because evangelicals occupy a more prominent role in American politics today.

The racism embedded within populist revolutions in the US is a central theme for analyzing either President Jackson or President Trump. Both took advantage of discriminatory ideologies and violence during their campaigns to build support, then each populist President delivered an agenda that created chaos due less to malice than incompetence. Trump seems to like the seventh President, but this has proved a more astute comparison than he intended. She is writing her dissertation proposal on the Sabbath mail controversy beyond church and state from through She earned her Masters with a concentration in Public History at American University in , while on track for her doctorate.

Follow her on Twitter at rebeccabbrenner. Based on research first featured on The Activist History Review , the twelve essays in this volume examine the role of history in shaping ongoing debates over monuments, racism, clean energy, health care, poverty, and the Democratic Party. Together they show the ways that the issues of today are historical expressions of power that continue to shape the present.

Also, be sure to review our book on Goodreads and join our Goodreads group to receive notifications about upcoming promotions and book discussions for Demand the Impossible! We here at The Activist History Review are always working to expand and develop our mission, vision, and goals for the future. These efforts sometimes necessitate a budget slightly larger than our own pockets. If you have enjoyed reading the content we host here on the site, please consider donating to our cause.

Another fantastic piece on the AHR. I really enjoyed your perspective. As a non-specialist in Antebellum America, I was hoping to press you for further comments on the following points. At any time in the Antebellum era, did non-religious Jacksonian Democrats make up a majority of his supporters? Second, when I think of Evangelical Protestants in the Antebellum era, I think of activist groups from the Northeast, but also Evangelical white Southerners who used a Biblical understanding of slavery to push a proslavery agenda.

Do you think we should also understand Protestant Evangelicals through that lens, or is that a bad framework? Like Liked by 1 person. What this article fails to mention is that that president Jackson was a Democrat.